Chicago Dispatchers

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Residency.

Over at Second City Cop, there's talk about the Chicago Teachers Union pushing a House bill to lift their residency requirement, which has been around for 20 years. The bill is circulating through state government to make Chicago's residency requirement illegal. It already passed the state House by a vote of 105 to 4, next step is the Senate.

The Scum-Times artticle SCC references states that CPS is the only district in Illinois with a residency rule. Of course it is, we all know how the city is, it's "exempt" from state law.

Mayor Daley has been a big proponent. He has argued that teachers will invest more in the schools if they live in the city.
Yeah - "invest more" as in "pump more money in" by way of rising taxes.

Of course, the article also states that "critics fear eliminating the rule will prompt thousands of tax-paying teachers to move out of Chicago. That old bottom line is always the biggest factor in the city's decisions, damn us city employees to hell.

We've wondered for a long time why the city requires its employees to live within the city limits, when most other cities in the state have nothing closer to that than a "x-mile radius" requirement, meaning you have to live within x miles of that city's boundaries. We always figured the city didn't want lose the tax base that is its employees. Not to mention, it's easier to make us comply with the rules, i.e., $75 city stickers. If we don't pay in a timely fashion, we get suspended. Which is understandable, we're not trying to shirk our responsibilities.

Okay, most of us aren't.

But housing is cheaper in suburbs, schools are better in the suburbs, the taxes are lower in the suburbs, and most importantly - it's easier to find a decent area to live in for a not-exorbitant house price. A lot of people talk around the job about how ridiculous it is that we're forced to live in the city on blue-collar salaries when costs of housing are sky high. A condominium around the OEMC grounds can fetch $400,000 easy.

We wonder if, as SCC suggests, the Teachers Union's House bill will set a precedent for other city workers. If it does (and our union bothers to join other unions to fight for us), then we can easily see people moving to suburbs in droves. And count us in.

Labels:

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't see where taxes are lower in the suburbs. Matter of fact all the burbs that I would like to move to within 40 mins of my job the taxes are thousands of dollars higher.

10 March, 2007 22:50  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Most of the people who work in NMC are private contractors and are not required to live within the City of Chicago, nor do they have a mile radius boundary.

These are the people that are charged with keeping our computers in some sort of working order. Now if Hizzoner were so concerned about someone having a vested interest in seeing the city work....wouldn't those people in those key positions of support to this "quality" 9-1-1 system be required to live here too?

11 March, 2007 13:55  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The ghetto mutts you are trying to get away from are now in the suburbs. The projects for the rejects were torn down so guess where they went??

13 March, 2007 10:09  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Chicago Dispatchers Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Law & Legal Blogs -  Blog Catalog Blog Directory