Chicago Dispatchers

Friday, January 25, 2008

Is It or Isn't It? To "b" or Not to "b"?

It didn't take long. Less than 1 week after the initial post in the co book--and only 3 days of actually adhering to it--apparently the B clause is out. History. Gone. No more. The OEMC has apparently and officially gone back to hiring for voluntary overtime by seniority as it has been done for several years. A new memo, dated 25 January 08 in the co book attests to this fact.

Blogmaster, relying upon a bevy of always reliable sources, is able to definitively say that this appears to be a case of management screw up (and really, there is no surpise there)and NOT union malaise (this time). It appears that the union, having been taken off guard, flexed its considerable muscle and called the city on the carpet for violating its previous agreement of non enforcement that was signed off on by its own suits. In short, the city tried to circumvent the labor/management agreement it agreed to only a scant few months ago, used a long holiday weekend to insert the notice of intent in the co book, and also apparently tried to blame the union for this whole fiasco. No surprise there. The suits at OEMC are notorious for being shifty, disrespectful, untrustworthy, and wholly incompetent (mostly).

So love it or hate it, the B clause is gone--for now at least. Love it or hate it, it appears to be a major victory for the union who forced the city to honor its previous agreement--said agreeement brokered with/by one of the very top level suits in the building.

To Blogmaster, the lesson here is twofold: the union, when pressed and under certain circumstances, does appear to be effective. One can only imagine what might actually be accomplished under some real (different) union leadership at the top levels. Second, this episode exposes how the OEMC does business and it is not a model in best practices or efficiencies. If the suits at the top can't even communicate with one another and learn SOMETHING about their underlings and the operations in which they manage, there is scant hope for improvement or betterment. And finally, to any pcos who still harbor benevolent feelings toward the suits, Blogmaster urges one to really consider what happened here and the track record of this particular regime. Enough said on that one.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've read the memo placed in the CO Book and it states the B clause has been temporarily put on hold. I'll save my cheers for when it's out of the contract and gone for good.

26 January, 2008 14:06  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wish they would hire us back for overtime pay! They don't want overtime when you have an excellent arrest. They send home a partner and you have to do paperwork by yourself, which actually takes longer than if 2 were working on it. Then again we don't get forced into overtime which could be a major hassle.

26 January, 2008 15:32  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's not a bad clause, what stinks is the lack of manpower we have. One day in a pipe dream far away, we actually may be staffed and wishing we had that clause.

27 January, 2008 05:03  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the problem is that clause should have never been in the contract, but since our union works for the city and not us, we get stuck with things like that.

27 January, 2008 10:13  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It was always in the contract since day one.

27 January, 2008 12:38  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The reason it was put in the original contract back in the 1970's was that there was NO overtime. So to make it fair it was put in to allow everyone the opportunity whenever there was any overtime available.

Looking at the overtime paid out last year, I don't think any of us have anything to worry about. Like someone said before it might not be the hours you want every time...but if you want it you can work it. Think how many people they would have to hire to cover all that overtime. It won't happen anytime soon. Especially the way they hire..8 or 10 at a time.

Go and see for yourself...

http://tinyurl.com/227xx8

27 January, 2008 19:51  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Chicago Dispatchers Blogarama - The Blog Directory
Law & Legal Blogs -  Blog Catalog Blog Directory